Tuesday, September 29, 2009
The internet has buzzed these last couple of days with news about the Staffordshire Hoard.
This image was taken from the blog at medievalists.net. In fact a great deal of the information regarding the find can be found on that blog as there seem to be a growing number of posts everyday. A quick browse of youtube will also add a growing number of news reports about the hoard.
The amateur treasure hunter named Terry Herbert, in some association with the Portable Antiquities Scheme in England which encourages people to go out with their metal detectors, did just that. In July of this year he came upon what is being toted as the largest Anglo-Saxon hoard of gold and silver that has ever been discovered. The last report I saw said that the items numbered 1,500. It was automatically toted as a big find. Apparently at least one scholar noted to Mr. Herbert that the find was not unlike the finding of King Tut's Tomb in its importance.
The sheer magnitude of the find is significant, but people who have come to see the exhibit at the Birmingham museum have noted that what strikes them the most is the intricacy of the metal work. Interesting as well, according to these early finds, is the nature of the collection. The items seem to be mostly masculine in nature. You don't find women's brooches or pins, which is what you typically find. Instead the find seems to be of a masculine nature; mostly the items are martial, bits of swords and hilts and the like. Speculation has been that this is perhaps from one battle, or perhaps it is the accumulated trophies.
Hoarding is not unusual. Anglo-saxon and viking hoards containing gold and silver have been found before. This particular find is generating a lot of excitement however. In fact, at least one former professor of mine has reported back 'that she has seen perfection.' She was awed (an this is impressive as she is a professor of Anglo-Saxons) by the intricate work and by the significance of the find. Facebook responses had already comeback on whether or not she has heard of any catalogue for the items.
What is really interesting for us, as Public Historians, is the way the wider audience has reacted to the find, and the implications that has had for the museum. Currently a portion of the collection is being showcased at at the Birmingham Museum. They are not disclosing the location of the farm where the find was made because they want to avoid treasure seekers swamping the area. The initial finds were only made in July after all. But it is in the midlands, and the find is also significant because its location is in the heart of the ancient Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia (some have speculated that the hoard may have belonged to a king). The exhibition is only going on until the middle of October, but so many have swarmed the museum to see the exhibit that on opening day they had to close it down for a little while while they moved it to a room with more space. It is closing in October because the items are being sent to the British museum for appraisal and for further study.
But because there has been such a strong public reaction, and because not just the people of England, but the people residing in the midlands have such a strong personal connection to the artifacts, the Birmingham museum has now begun a fight to keep the artifacts there, where the permanent exhibition would draw visitors, not unlike the exhibition for the Book of Kells draws people into the museum in Dublin. And the power behind possession of these items really comes across when you see the words used to describe the find, and the words of awe even sober serious academics like my professor use when talking about it. There is going to be a struggle.
It is also worth thinking about how much more excitement there is because of the physical nature of this find, the fact that it could be 'a king's' hoard, and is not just the wash bucket of your average everyday Anglo-Saxon. The fact that the find is made up largely of gold and silver is significant in calculating the power possession of the artifacts will have. But whoever left them there, clearly had a great deal of power himself.
All my information and photos came from medievalists.net and some from the Birmingham Post.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Last weekend I was sitting around with my family. If we can help it we try not to sit around. My mother in particular thinks this is bad idea because if we sit around we tend to all sit in separate rooms of the house. So we decided we would take a trip to the
It is moments like these which make me wonder why I decided to become a Medieval Historian. I will admit that a large part of my decision to study Vikings as opposed to anything that might have had more sources, something like monastic history, is largely because of the implicit connection that Viking Studies has with Canadian History. But how did I come to this decision in
Similarly, there are not that many South Asian historians in
Monuments like the Stephen Leacock museum are focal points of their community. They give the surrounding area that sense of community and they are important locations for local Historical Societies. They are the physical manifestations of that personal connection that someone feels with their history, and for the more romantic amongst us, these monuments give you that tingly feeling of History, capital H. I count myself amongst them, otherwise I don’t think I would have become an historian. And a monument like the Stephen Leacock Museum or the Plains of Abraham are better representations of that overwhelming sense of history because they also happen to be the geographical locations where the event occurred. This certainly adds to the romanticism of the monument.
It is both this romanticism surrounding history and that sense that history and historical monuments are focal points of communities which really helps to keep history relevant. You can argue as well that history teaches valuable lessons, which is true, but that is not really why people study it, nor is it why people visit museums.
No one struggles with relevance like Medievalists; particularly Medievalists who work outside of the geographical locations they study. There are no monuments which incite the interest of the populace here. There may be artefacts which arrive at our local or metropolitan museums, but they are devoid of that geographical connection. And if you study Vikings you may get an axe, or a brooch, but in reality the artifacts are few and far between. Viking weapons and armoury are largely made of leather and wood. Their houses were often turf houses, or halls with inside timber frames, insulated with turf. Ship burials and mounds are some of the more exciting archaeological finds, but a great majority of the work is done with high tech imagery which studies depths and variations in soils so we can see where the post markings of halls had been. The rune stones of
So where does that personal connection, or that curiosity come from if not from the monuments to the culture. Instead of physical evidence, for the many of us who study things exterior to our community we are incited by what we might call a mental monument. Let me explain; when I say mental monument I am looking to find the key elements that make us want to study a history when we can not be moved by its physical monuments.
As Canadians this may be easy enough to do because, arguably, up until recently our historians and teachers were more concerned with teaching us the far off history of Europe than they were with teaching us our own. However, that is part of our history as well, this intense connection (on the part of the visible majority) to our European roots. Our culture is very similar to that of Europeans, and many Canadians claim descent from
Physical monuments, however, are not the only way our interest is piqued. Literature as well gives us something tangible that connects us with history. For instance, you don’t have to have visited the
Therefore it is these distant physical remains and an increasingly readily available body of literature which creates these mental monuments, these impressions which stir the romantic in us. Yet one could argue the most crucial element is not necessarily these artifacts, but instead it is the tradition around them created by previous historians, whose traditions we are inheriting. They decided this history was important because of the literature and monuments that they had access to. And because it was studied by them it is more easily studied by us, who were delighted with the tales they told. In addition, this history has become part of our wider (popular) culture so that the history is self-perpetuating. Because a pseudo Medievalism becomes of interest to the popular culture a new generation of Medievalists develops an interest, and hence a personal connection with that history.
Let’s return to the South Asian historian. It is this process of globalization that brings that mental monument to
North American Medievalists have it easier than South Asian Historians because of the geographical and (arguable) ethnic connection with the historiography, if not the history. But when I visit my local historic sites I still find myself doubting my choice. When I read a saga I don’t. The romanticism surrounding the Vikings will always capture my imagination but I will also always have a soft spot for Canadian History. Many different histories excite my interest.
We actually didn’t get a chance to go into the